no one in his sanity would defend Jaya Bachchan For telling the photographer that even Jaya himself hoped he tripped and fell. It was an absurd moment. We all have moments when rational behavior becomes blurred.
Since then, I’m sure the photographer’s mother was no longer a fan of Batchan’s after this incident. Yes, Mr. Bachchan cannot escape his wife’s glare.
Jaya Bachchan was completely off the mark, venting his anger at a poor photographer who was supposedly told by his boss to either get something spicy and sell well or find another job. But look at the embarrassing events from the other side. Prominent members of the entertainment industry often find it very difficult to protect their private spaces with their children.
whether it is Virat-Anushka Also Wallet – Karina, they all pay for the imprudence of a specific section of Nova and its opposite number (what do you call a male Nova?) that informs paps every time they visit a restaurant or airport. I’ve heard that some of them pretend to get on a plane, get off at the airport, stroll through immigration gates, make sure “airport exterior” is clicked, and then go home.
Appease the wrath of Jaya Bachchan, Tarpsy Pannu with the paparazzi. I know a starlet who tails cricketers and notifies photographers of all schedules for stalking plans.
It’s really that easy. “No” really means “no.” If an actor like Jaya Bachchan says he doesn’t want to be clicked, turn the camera elsewhere. There are many who do. Shoot them.
I can confidently say that many top actors hate being clicked. Ranbir Kapoor hate it. Years ago, when a photographer insisted on clicking on him despite being repeatedly told not to, he snatched his camera and made a quick run for it.
Photographers must necessarily respect celebrity space. Second, celebrities must respect the photographer’s right to click him or her in public, and the friction between her two parties on both sides of the camera is nothing new. fifteen years, Amitabh Bachchan prohibited from reporting. He said he did this in retaliation to the media for banning him during the emergency due to his proximity to the Gandhi family.
Bachchan explained: When the state of emergency was declared in 1975, film journalists mistakenly attributed the state of emergency censorship to my work. They said, “Amitabh Bachchan should be banned because this man is close to Indira Gandhi and is involved in censorship of the press.” I stopped doing that too. In fact, if I’m in a movie and they mention the star cast, they put a comma in place of my name. I felt that I should have the freedom to ban. So every time I was filming or a reporter wanted to see me, I declined. This went on for about 15 years. “
In the end, Mr. Bachchan relented. he needed the press. Jaya Bachchan does not.
Subhash K Jha is a Patna-based film critic who has written about Bollywood for a long time and knows the industry well. He tweets at @SubhashK_Jha.
https://www.firstpost.com/entertainment/jaya-bachchan-is-not-entirely-wrong-in-reprimanding-the-paparazzi-11537041.html Jaya Bachchan Wasn’t Completely Wrong After Reprimanding Paparazzi!